firestomper247
Six Pointer
Just wondering if this is still going to be on the ballot? I haven't heard much about it lately.
This is where the repubs suck. Spend all your political time and capital on gay and not on making NC the lowest tax state with maximum 2a rights in the south east. My 2 biggest concerns
I would vote against it bc I appreciate the vetting process...without this measure, I believe there is a greater chance for reckless carry, which could ultimately be used against us...permit is a small compromise to pay
That's pretty much it. They chose some bone-headed battles this year…
it extends further back than hb2. the first thing they went after when gaining full control was "protection of marriage".
And making various and necessary reforms to the firearms laws.
They even tried to remove the "pistol purchase permit" nonsense.
I would vote against it bc I appreciate the vetting process...without this measure, I believe there is a greater chance for reckless carry, which could ultimately be used against us...permit is a small compromise to pay
Exactly. It's not difficult to understand. Unfortunately, the liberals sure know how to cook a frog. We've all gotten SOOOO used to accepting crap like that.shall not be infringed
you do not need permission to exercise a right.
So it's OK for some of you that gang-bangers can legally carry, which could increase access to firearms in instances where there should be no firearm?
Seems to me like more unjustified shootings would just fuel the liberal, anti-gun media, which has great control over the direction of our country
So it's OK for some of you that gang-bangers can legally carry, which could increase access to firearms in instances where there should be no firearm?
Seems to me like more unjustified shootings would just fuel the liberal, anti-gun media, which has great control over the direction of our country
Do you think the NC Concealed Carry Permit process stops them now from carrying.
Yes, I do think it influences some instances...but I don't have any data to prove or disprove. Do you have any data?
so by your reasoning and assumptions places like Chicago and NYC and DC should be the safest cities and have the lowest incidences of gun crime........yet the exact inverse is true. Let me say it like this...........NO LAW IS GOING TO STOP A CRIMINAL FROM CARRYING OR OBTAINING A FIREARM ILLEGALLY.
so by your reasoning and assumptions places like Chicago and NYC and DC should be the safest cities and have the lowest incidences of gun crime........yet the exact inverse is true. Let me say it like this...........NO LAW IS GOING TO STOP A CRIMINAL FROM CARRYING OR OBTAINING A FIREARM ILLEGALLY.
So who gets to decide who can CC and who can't? What if "they" decide YOU don't need to be CC'ing? Also if it is ok to restrict and limit the 2nd amendment why not the 1st? or 5th? or 4th?
So it's OK for some of you that gang-bangers can legally carry, which could increase access to firearms in instances where there should be no firearm?
Seems to me like more unjustified shootings would just fuel the liberal, anti-gun media, which has great control over the direction of our country
,,,,,,, I'm more worried about no AR 15 or no 10+ capacity and would rather fight those restrictions.
I would vote against it bc I appreciate the vetting process...without this measure, I believe there is a greater chance for reckless carry, which could ultimately be used against us...permit is a small compromise to pay